Welcome Guest! Login
Home   About   Participate   Research Directory   Capacity Building   Public Dialogue   CBERN Events   PRI   Research Snapshots   NCE   
   
Details
NameAn Investigation of Real Versus Perceived Corporate Social Performance in S&P 500 firms
Author(s)Liston-Heyes, Catherine and Gwen Ceton
Editor
Year2009
Publication TypeJournal Article
Web Locationhttp://www.springerlink.com/content/y6g32k4197537757/
Keywordscorporate reputation - corporate social responsibility - Fortune America’s Most Admired Companies - KLD data regression analysis
Areas of InterestCorporate Governance; Corporate Social Responsibility; SRI/Responsible Investment; Theory - Stakeholder
CitationListon-Heyes, Catherine and Gwen Ceton. 2009. An Investigation of Real Versus Perceived Corporate Social Performance in S&P 500 firms. Journal of Business Ethics 89 (2):283-296.
SummaryFirms are spending billions annually in the name of corporate social responsibility (CSR). Whilst markets are increasingly willing to reward good and responsible firms, they lack the instruments to me
Abstract / DescriptionFirms are spending billions annually in the name of corporate social responsibility (CSR). Whilst markets are increasingly willing to reward good and responsible firms, they lack the instruments to measure corporate social performance (CSP). To convince investors and other stakeholders, firms invest heavily in building a reputation for good corporate behaviour. This article argues that reputations for CSP are often unrepresentative of true CSP and investigates how differences in 'perceived' and 'actual' -- as measured by the Fortune and KLD databases, respectively -- can partly be explained by firm characteristics. Amongst other things, it finds that overrated firms are more likely to be relatively big, profitable, operating in non-polluting but competitive industries and with no history of wrong doings to their primary stakeholders. They will also typically spend a lot of effort satisfying the claims of their secondary stakeholders. Above all, the results emphasise the need for researchers to recognise that the databases measure different phenomenon and are not interchangeable.
Publisher/OrganizationJournal of Business Ethics
Cluster LibrarySocially Responsible Investment

©2013 Created by CBERN